Nedra and I saw a documentary on the use of drones in
warfare. It was a very unsettling experience.
The photographs and films of dead children and the sight of them in
hospitals with their healing wounds and lost limbs makes it difficult to accept
the term “collateral damage” as anything less than a rationalization that some critics would condemn as evil. If it is terrorism to us when a
suicide bomber blows up a bus or hotel, it is an act of terrorism to civilians in
Pakistan who are sacrificed as “collateral damage” in an effort to assassinate
a person on a kill list. It is also disturbing
for those who believe in the importance of law.
To be placed there by an anonymous informant (often the way espionage
picks up information) who cannot be challenged in a court of law makes it hard
to distinguish from what used to be called “kangaroo court” justice. The use of kill lists also invites a similar tit
for tat response to these killings. Do those who do this not think of the capacity
of vengeance among the survivors and neighbors of the “collateral” dead? What
about the psychological effects on those who kill at a distance and do not see
their victims, but learn of the collateral dead through TV or newspaper
accounts (if they are publicized in their neighborhoods)? I recall reading Howard Zinn describing his
work as a bombardier in WWII. As the war
was coming to an end he was sent on two last minute missions. One was in southern France. The other was in Czechoslovakia. In both cases he dropped the bombs on the
targets. When he returned he was told that these were successful military
missions with little collateral damage.
A few years later he was in Europe and decided to visit those
towns. He learned to his horror that he
killed some 2000 civilians in France as well as German soldiers who had fled Hitler’s
losing army and were hiding in what they thought was a safe area until the war
ended. He also learned that some 800 civilians
were killed in Czechoslovakia. He also
learned, from a later search of war records that the mission to southern France
was added on to bolster the record of a commanding officer who hoped for a promotion. I have no way of verifying Zinn’s account,
but I do not doubt its likelihood because war is rarely clean and ethics are
set aside or interpreted to satisfy rationalizations that argue that these means are essential for survival, honor, or justice.
What worried me most about the documentary on the use of drones is that
they are cheaper to make than fighter planes and many countries are now making
them. The technology to target them is
also not so sophisticated that other countries would lack the skills to make
them. I hate to think what it would be like for those drones to be in the hands
of dozens of countries or even home grown terrorist groups who do not like
Jews, African Americans, liberals, illegal immigrants, union organizers, Muslims, gays, Tea party extremists, fanatical fundamentalists, Wall Street tycoons, and
billionaires perceived as robber barons.
Both the extreme left and the extreme right are vulnerable to those who
make their own kill lists. I hope we
once again bring back “a rule of law” and not this murderous philosophy of
by-passing the court protections written into our constitution.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment